Sunday, 30 December 2012

Aurobindo


AUROBINDO GHOSH (1872 – 1950 )
  • Unit Structure
  •  9.0 Objectives
  • 9.1 A Brief Life History 
  • 9.2 Sri. Aurobindo as a Philosopher. 
  • 9.3 The Two Negations 
  • 9.4 Aurobindo‘s Views on Reality 
  • 9.5 Aurobindo‘s on Mind 
  • 9.6 Functions of education 
  • 9.7 Integral Education 
  • 9.8 Aims of education 
  • 9.9 Integral Curriculum 
  • 9.10 Aims of education according to Integral education 
  • 9.11 Methods of Teaching 
  • 9.12 Methods of Teaching 
  • 9.13 Principles of teaching and learning. 
  • 9.14 The Teacher: 
  • 9.15 National system of education. 
  • 9.16 Let us sum up 



9.0 OBJECTIVES:

 After reading this unit you will be able To understand the views of Sri Aurobindo on the controversies of materialistic and ascetic thoughts in philosophy. To understand the philosophical interpretation of Sri Aurobindo on Reality. To understand the various levels of mind and its functions. To understand the concept of integral education. To understand his views on aims of education, curriculum, role of teacher and methods of teaching.


9.1 A BRIEF LIFE HISTORY

Aurobindo was born in an educated middle class family in Calcutta on 15th Aug. 1972. He went to England at the age of 7 and lived there for 14 years. He received his education at Cambridge At the age of 18, he passed the entrance examination of the Indian Civil Service. Besides English, he mastered Latin and Greek and learnt French, German and Spanish. In 1893, on his return from England, he joined as professor of English at Baroda College in Gujarat. Here, besides devoting himself to cultural and literary activities, learnt Bengali, Gujarati, Marathi and Sanskrit. 

He joined the Indian National Congress and became an active freedom fighter. He was a revolutionary and was disappointed with the Moderates of the Indian National Congress. He started the Bengali daily ‗Yugantar‘ and English daily ‗Bande Mataram‘ to promote his revolutionary ideas. He was considered one of the most dangerous leaders by the British government. From a revolutionary freedom fighter, he became a philosopher and seer. In 1908, he was sent to jail for the Alipore Bomb case. During this time, he turned to yoga, meditation and study of religious, philosophical and spiritual literature. This changed him a lot. 

He went to Pondicherry and spent his remaining 40 years in his Ashram there. He changed himself and involved in several educational and social activities. He proposed theories of education which catered to Indian needs. He set up an International Ashram and International Centre of education and social activities. He also started a new experiment known as ‗Aurowill‘ as a city of human unity. 


9.2 SRI. AUROBINDO AS A PHILOSOPHER

 Sri. Aurobindo cannot be considered a philosopher in the strict western sense though he had acquired the western philosophical traditions through his British education and later readings. It is also wrong to think of him as a traditional Indian ‗ holy man‘ though many in India recognized him not only as an accomplished ‗yogi‘ but also as an avatar of new age. 

What we find in him is not a fusion of philosophical- religious types, but an appearance of a new kind of thinker whose methods are of spiritual inquiry derived from the Indian tradition with a completely new frame of intellectual reference to modern science and the challenge of transcending through the conflict between religion and materialism, tradition and modernization. It is also wrong to consider him as a ‗Hindu thinker‘ for; Hinduism sought only ‗eternal law,‘ ‗sanatana dharma,‘ which is not an Indian monopoly.

His spiritual inquiry was aimed at clearing the weaknesses of current thinking about conflicts between the spiritual quest and functional materialism. He showed the new ways of seeing the relationship of man to
the natural environment and to the material aspects of existence. He is undoubtedly more ‗systematic‘ a thinker than Gandhi and Tagore. Like Jiddu Krishnamurti, Sri Aurobindo also believed that what we call as religious is not primarily a matter of doctrines or dogmas, but of experience. He says what validates a religious intuition is the experience of its spiritual authenticity.

It is not a point of view or collection of ideas given down through generations, but is entirely first hand personal experience. Aurobindo wondered if one could discover the means to connect the personal religious experience to the modern world‘s larger but inherently religious analytical rationality. 

Check your progress Fill in the blanks with correct option.
i. Aurobindo started a new experiment called____________ .
 (a)Bande Mataram. (b) Aurowill (c) yoga. (d) Materialism.

ii. Aurobindo can be considered as a ____________.
(a) Hindu thinker (b) Western philosopher. (c) Indian holy man. (d) New kind of thinker.

iii. Aurobindo‘s spiritual inquiry was aimed at clearing the conflicts between ______________ .
(a) The experience of the spiritual authenticity. (b) The spiritual quest and functional materialism. (c) Hindu thought and Islamic thought. (d) Sanatana dharma and eternal law.


 9.3. THE TWO NEGATIONS 

One of the cornerstones of Aurobindo‘s outlook is his concept of the two ‗Negations‘. He maintains that the ascetic ideal that became dominant in India after the spread of Buddhism was a withdrawal from the world, which he calls the ‗revolt of Spirit against Matter‘. This resulted in an over-emphasis on transcendent realization and undervaluing of the natural world. This tendency was strengthened in Hinduism by the Shankara School of the ninth century which taught that reality was spiritual and that the material world was merely ‗qualified reality‘. This illusion that dominated Hinduism resulted in social indifference to material progress thus loosing the balance between things spiritual and things material. Thus, the sub-continent lagged behind the western world with regard to material progress.

The other negation was materialism. Materialism denies the reality of the spirit, insisting that it is an illusion, a mere projection of personal fantasy. Both these negations are the result of exaggerating a part of the
truth to claim that it is the whole truth. In his book ‗The Life Divine‘, Aurobindo wrote, both negations are opposite poles of the same error.


 9.4. AUROBINDO‘S VIEWS ON REALITY 

The negation of materialism in India and refusal of the ascetic in Europe have sought to assert themselves as the sole truth and dominate the conception of life. In India, if this has lead to a great heaping up of the treasures of the spirit and a bankruptcy of life, it was just the opposite in Europe; accumulation of riches and world‘s powers moved towards a bankruptcy of things of the spirit. Aurobindo is in total agreement with Vivekananda when he says that we progress not from error to truth, but from partial truth to more complete truth. It is characteristic of Aurobindo‘s intellectual method that he avoids simplistic juxtapositions of contrarieties, but finds a reasonable basis for recognizing that what appears inconsistent is actually compatible and are different aspects of the same reality which is more complex and subtle. 

Placing spirit and matter either on an analytical test of science or spiritual understanding by religion has failed to satisfy the people. What is needed, according to him, is to place both material world and spiritual world at the same realm. Aurobindo argues that the world as it is must claim attention of religion, because this world is one part of the total cosmic domain transformable by the Spirit. He rejects the view of those who focus on the promises of the ‗hereafter‘ on the fulfillment of individual soul as a reward for renouncing evil and doing ‗good‘. His objection is not based on a conviction that these views are spiritually false, but rather that the truth is partial. The error is not absolute, but it is in the aggregation of a part of the truth and considering it as the all embracing reality. 

He wrote, ―The ascent of man in to heaven is not the key, the key is rather his ascent here into the spirit and descent of spirit into his normal earthly nature of humanity. The second major element in Aurobindo‘s thought is that transcendence is to be sought in this world rather than the next. He maintains that just as humans evolved genetically from simpler to more complex organisms; it is possible for human beings to evolve continuously as spiritual beings. He makes no concession to the well established convention of thought that matter is here, spirit there, and only when the threshold of death is traversed may we expect a higher existence. For him, both can be achieved in this world by rising above the blindness of selfishness and by achieving a higher consciousness.

Fundamental to Aurobindo‘s message is that no single perspective on man or God is able to disclose more than partial truth. Hence, his work is filled with subtle and complex distinctions between levels of consciousness in man, and different aspects of Brahman. He strongly believes that the natural world is not separate from the all embracing ‗Absolute’. If Divine is everywhere, then certainly it is there in man also, may be a partially concealed spirit. Through spiritual disciplines, one is able to uncover this spirit which is hidden by our ego. What is new in Aurobindo is the firm conviction that a new spiritual discipline is necessary to achieve the next stage in spiritual evolution of humanity. The divine in man can be obtained by the spiritual discipline called yoga. The task is to find it, develop it and use it. His concept of yoga is not that of a ‗sanyasi‘ who turns away from life in order to turn towards God. 

Yoga is a spiritual discipline. In it mental intuitions are admitted only as a first step for realization. They must be confirmed and adjusted by experience. The obstacle in achieving this spiritual discipline is not the material limitations of the natural world, but our failure to seek the inner self that is already a higher consciousness. Aurobindo wrote, ―Because man is wrapped up in his own outward going mind, because he has not learned to live within; he is not conscious of this self‖. Yoga is for the ordinary man, while he carries out his worldly pursuits. If a merchant wishes to follow yoga, he regards his work as Divine; he does not use unfair practices to earn money. If a student looks for higher values, he must observe ‗brahmacharya‘. 

Check your progress Answer the following in one or two sentences 
1. What was the result of the so called ‗revolt of the spirit against matter?
2. What was the reason for India lag behind the western world with regard to material progress?
3. What according to Aurobindo is the obstacle in achieving the spiritual discipline of ‗yoga‘?
4. What is fundamental to Aurobindo‘s message?


9.5 AUROBINDO‘S VIEWS ON MIND

His concept of mind is different from others. To him, the mind is the primary means of manifestation in man. Mind is not a thing. It should not be equated with the brain. It is a function or a process. The function of mind expresses itself in higher mental processes in feelings, emotions, attention, and memory etc.

In his writings he brings out the different planes of mind. They are :-
1) The ordinary mind
2) the higher mind
3) The illuminated mind
4) The intuitive mind
5) The over mind
6) The super mind.
Ordinary mind is divided into three different parts—

  • thinking mind:  is concerned with ideas and knowledge,
  • dynamic mind:  is concerned with forces of realization of ideas,
  • externalizing mind:  with expression of them in life. 

Aurobindo also writes about thinking mind and vital mind which may then be considered as functions of mind. The action of the thinking mind is to doubt, to question, to argue to reason, to be bold enough to reject if it is uncertain and repeat the process again and again. Man‘s mind is an imperfect instrument to catch the full integral truth. According to Aurobindo, the errors of conceptual mind must be corrected by the super mind which acts as a link between ‗sachidananda‘ and universe, knowledge and ignorance.

Super mind is the divine gnosis (having special knowledge). This super mind creates, governs and upholds the world. It is omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent. It is the Lord within. In it there is no distinction of knowledge known or unknown. According to Sri Aurobindo, super mind is a state of consciousness. One can acquire it gradually. After acquiring it, one must use it for transforming his entire being, his body, mind and soul which one attains through the super mind; he becomes a superman, a ‗jnani‘ or Gnostic at our own plane of being.
Ordinary mind can become super mind by yoga.

 Check your progress Answer the following a sentence or two. 
1. What is the function of mind?
2. What are the different planes of mind?
3. What according to Aurobindo one should do after acquiring super mind ?
4. How can an ordinary mind become a super mind?


9.6. FUNCTIONS OF EDUCATION

The main functions of education can be summarized as follows.

  • i. To bring out the real man in oneself.
  • ii. To build the power of the human mind and spirit i.e. evoking of knowledge, character and culture.
  • iii. To enable the individual to establish a clear continuity between the past, present and future.
  • iv. To enable the individual to establish right relationship within himself and outside-world.


9.7. INTEGRAL EDUCATION 

True education, according to Sri Aurobindo, is not only spiritual but also rational, vital and physical. In other words it is integral education. This integral education has been explained by Sri Aurobindo‘s closest collaborator, the Mother in these words. ―Education to be complete must have five principal aspects relating to the five principal activities of human being: the physical, the vital, the mental, the psychic and the spiritual. This education is complete, complimentary to each other and continued till the end of life. 

Aurobindo‘s scheme of education is integral in two senses. Firstly, it is integral in the sense inculcating all the five aspects of the individual being. Secondly, it is integral in the sense of being an education not only for the evolution of the individual alone, but also of the nation and finally of the humanity. The ultimate aim of education is the evolution of total humanity. In this scheme of evolution, the principle of growth is unity in diversity. This unity again, maintains and helps the evolution of diversity. 

  • The integral School 

The ultimate aim of education is man-making. It prepares the educand to work first as a human being and then as a member of a nation and finally as an individual. The circles of moral responsibility and loyalties proceed from wider to narrower and vice-versa. The man has to develop first as a human being then as a citizen and finally as an individual. Most of the present confusion of values is due to an inversion of this order. That education which comes naturally, easily, effectively and without strain is called integral education. Integral education is complete education. 
Important aspects that constitute integral education are:-


  • i. Strengthening of mental and physical aspects.
  • ii. Achievement of five principal aspects – the physical, vital, mental, psychic and spiritual. All the above five aspects have to be developed together.
  • iii. Development of the four aspects of truth namely; love, knowledge, power, and beauty.
  • iv. Development of the vehicles of truth namely psychic for love, mind for knowledge, vital for power and physical body for expression of physical beauty.

Shri Aurobindo believes in these ultimate principles of individuality, commonality and essentiality. These, in other words, are the educand, the society and the humanity. Integral education, according to him, must include evolution of all these three elements. These should develop together. This is the purpose of the school. In his lectures at Baroda college, Shri Aurbindo observed that the colleges and universities should educate through their academic as well as social activities. 

The school cannot be isolated from society. If cannot give total education in isolation. Its teachings have to be practiced in the society outside it. In the integral school four types of rooms are required to carry on various activities: 
1. Rooms of silence, 
2. Rooms of collaboration, 
3. Rooms of consultation, 
4. Lecture room. 
Thus the school will develop different types of activities such as silence, collaboration, consultation and lectures. It will provide play, activity, discovery, innovation and finally development of the powers of the body, mind and spirit of the educand. In brief, the integral school will provide opportunities for integral development. In fact, the aims, curriculum and methods of teaching are in the light of these concepts of integral education. 

Check your progress Say whether the following statements are true or false. If false correct the statement. 

1. To Aurobindo, one of the main functions of education is to establish right relationship with past, present and future.
2. According to ‗Mother‘ complete education must have five aspects relating to the five principal activities of human beings.
3. Integral education is meant for the individual only.
4. The purpose of school is the simultaneous development of the educand the society and humanity.


9.8 AIMS OF EDUCATION ACCORDING TO INTEGRAL EDUCATION

i. Perfection of soul: The main aim of education is to‖ help the growing soul to draw out that is best and make it perfect for a noble cause‖

ii. Realization of inner self: Education should enable him to realize his inner self which is a part of the universal consciousness. He has to enter into right relationships not only within himself but also with the people of country and with the universal society to which he belongs.

iii. Physical development: Physical development of the child is another important aim of education. It will be misguiding to say that those who are physically strong are mentally weak. Without physical development no other development is possible.

iv. Development of morality: Without moral and emotional development mental developmental becomes harmful to human progress. The three essential factors for the moral development of a child are emotions, impressions or habits and nature. So it is necessary that the ideals of a teacher should be so high that the child by mere imitation is able to reach higher stages of development.

v. The development of senses: Education should aim at the training of senses. According to him senses can be trained fully when manas, chitta and nerve are pure.

vi. Development of consciousness: another important aim of education is to develop consciousness. According to him it has four levels.
(i) Chitta (ii) Manas (iii) Intelligence (iv) Knowledge. A teacher should develop all these four levels harmoniously. This will promote the development of conscience.

vii. Harmony of the individual and collectivity: Most of the socio-political thinkers have either laid emphasis upon the individual or collectivity. But Aurobindo aims at realization of harmony between individuals and also between nations. His scheme of education therefore is truly international. Explaining this ideal of Sri Aurobindo‘s scheme The Mother said, ―For all world organizations, to be real and to be able to live, must be based on mutual respect and understanding between nation and nation as well as between individual and individual. It is only in the collective order and organization, in a collaboration based upon mutual goodwill that lies the possibility of man being lifted of the painful chaos where he is now. It is with this aim and in this spirit that all human problems will be studied at the university centre, and their solution will be given in the light of the supra-mental knowledge which Aurobindo has revealed.‖

viii. Cultivation of values: The present crisis of man is due to the chaos of values. Old values have been challenged while new values have not firmly taken their place. Character formation very much depends on value. The supreme value in Sri Aurobindo‘s thought is harmony. Other values are spirituality, divinity, evolution, ascent, transformation etc. the most important value for required for all growth is sincerity. Once that is developed, the rest follows.


9.9 INTEGRAL CURRICULUM

Sri Aurobindo Ghosh prescribed a free environment for the children to develop all the latent faculties to the full and suggested all those subjects and activities of child‘s interest to be included in the principles of curriculum. 
  • i All life is education. So curriculum is not confined to a limited syllabus and a few text books. 
  • ii It should include all those subjects which promote mental and spiritual development. 
  • iii It is a means towards an end, not an end in itself, the end being the development of integral personality. 
  • iv It should provide for leisure pursuits. 
  • v There should be flexibility to meet individual needs. 
  • vi Subjects of curriculum should be able to motivate children. 
  • vii Curriculum should involve creativity of life and constructive activities 
  • viii Curriculum should be interesting.


On the basis of the above principles, Aurobindo has prescribed the following subjects in the curriculum:

1. For primary stage: Mother Tongue, English, National History, Art, Painting, General Science, Social Studies, and Arithmetic.
2. Secondary stage: Mother tongue, English, French, Arithmetic, Art, Chemistry, Physics, Botany, Social Studies, Physiology, Health Education.
3. University Stage: Indian and western philosophy, History of Civilization, English, Literature, French, Sociology, Psychology, History of Science, Chemistry, Physics, Botany, International relations and integration.
4. Vocational Education: Arts, painting, photography, sewing, sculptural, drawing, type, shorthand, collage industries, carpentry, nursing, mechanical and electrical engineering, Indian and European music, and dramatization.

Check your progress Attempt the following in short. 
1. List the aims of integral education.
2. How does education in the realization of universal consciousness?
3. When can senses be trained fully according to Aurobindo?
4. What solution does Aurobindo suggest for lifting man out of the chaos in which he is now?
5. What are the different levels of consciousness according to Aurobindo?
6. What is the supreme value in Sri Aurobindo‘s thought?
7. Why should curriculum be not confined to a limited syllabus?
8. Why does Aurobindo say that curriculum is not an end in itself?
9. What is the justification for Aurobindo including art, painting, music, etc. in the curriculum?


9.10. METHODS OF TEACHING 

The following principles of methods of teaching have been stressed by Sri. Aurobindo.
1. Love and sympathy for the child
2. Education through mother tongue
3. Education according to the interests of the child
4. Education through self experience
5. Emphasis on learning by doing
6. Education through co-operation of teacher and students in the education process
7. Education according to the nature of child- considering the divinity in the child and latent gifts of mind and spirit
8. Freedom of child- free environment to gain more knowledge through his own efforts.


9.11. PRINCIPLES OF TEACHING AND LEARNING

i. The first principle is that ―nothing can be taught, but everything can be earned‖. The teacher is a helper and guide, not an instructor or task master. He doesn‘t impart knowledge but shows him the way to acquire Knowledge which is already within him.

ii. The second principle is that the mind has to be consulted in its growth. It is wrong to mould the child into the shape desired by the parent or teacher ignoring and destroying the divine in the child. To face the nature of the child to abandon its own dharma is to do permanent harm says Aurobindo.

iii. The third principle of teaching is to work from near to far, from the known to unknown. Education should be according to the nature of the child. He says man‘s nature is molded by his souls past, his
heredity and his environment. The past is the foundation, the present is the material and the future is the aim and each should find its due place in any national system of education.


9.12 THE TEACHER 
Sri Aurobindo has assigned a very important place to the teacher. However, he has not made him central as in the ancient Indian scheme. The teacher remains the philosopher and the guide. The Guru does not have absolute authority. He aims at turning the disciple‘s eye towards the beacon light of his own Godhead. In fact the real teacher is within the educand. He is the God. He is the ultimate guide and yet the teacher plays an important role in arousing the educand towards God within. He has not to impose his opinions or demand passive surrender from the educand. Sri Aurobindo compared the teacher to a gardener. Sri Aurobindo emphasizes an inner relationship the educator and the educand. 

Describing as to who is a teacher, The Mother has laid down the following qualifications. 
  1. One must be a saint and a hero to become a good teacher.
  2. One must be a good yogi to become a good teacher. 
  3. He should be absolutely disciplined and have an integrated personality. 
  4. He should be absolutely disciplined and have an integrated personality. 
  5. One must have the perfect attitude in order to be able to exact a perfect attitude from one‘s pupils. 
  6. A teacher who does not possess a perfect calm, an unflinching endurance and who are full of self-deceit will reach nowhere. 
  7. He should be able to eliminate his ego, master his mind and develop an insight into human nature. 
  8. The most important thing in a teacher is not knowledge but the attitude. 
  9. The teacher also should grow along with the pupils. 
  10. The Mother says, ― If a teacher is to be respected, he must be respectable.



9.13 NATIONAL SYSTEM OF EDUCATION. 

Aurobindo strongly argued for national system of education. He put forward the following elements.

  • i. Education does not become national by tagging the word ‗national‘ to the system. 
  • ii. Education should pay due attention to sacrifice, progress and increasing knowledge.
  • iii. Mere knowledge of science doesn‘t make us educated in the true sense. This must be related to powers of the human mind and spirit. 
  • iv. There should be a balanced understanding of the national and international relationship of universal relationship. 


Check your progress State whether the following statements are true or false. If wrong correct the same. 
1. Sri Aurobindo proposes education through experience.
2. A child can gain knowledge through his own efforts in a free environment.
3. The teacher has no role to play in the child‘s development.
4. A saint is a good teacher.
5. A teacher must have an insight into human nature.
6. Education does not become by not tagging ‗national‘ to the system.
7. Knowledge science must be related to powers of mind and spirit to become education in the true sense.
8. The most important thing in a teacher is his attitude.
9. Education should pay due attention to sacrifice, progress and not knowledge.


9.14. LET US SUM UP

The synthesis of the great philosophy of Sri Aurobindo can be summed up in one phrase: ―Realization of the sublime ‗Truth‘ which can be achieved through the Integral view of life, Being a superman and the Gnostic individual, Descent of Divine Power, intuition, yoga and super mind. By integral view of life, he implied ―a healthy integration of God and man”. Aurobindo placed premium on intuition and not on logical reasoning and preached the gospel of ―intuition and more perfect intuition”. His idea on yoga was aimed at divinizing the whole man and for this he advised the education of the mind. To Aurobindo only such education was true and living which helped one to develop his latent powers and enabled him to entre into the right relationship with life, mind soul of his nations well as with the total life, mind and soul of humanity. Information cannot be the foundation of intelligence, but can help build knowledge, the starting point of further discovery and creation of fresh knowledge. An education that confines itself to imparting knowledge is no education. Education must be based on the psychology of the child‘s nature. Parents and teachers must enable the child to educate himself, to develop his own practical, intellectual, moral and aesthetic capacities and to grow independently as an organic being. 


9.15 UNIT END EXERCISE
1. What are the different opinions about Sri Aurobindo as a philosopher? What is your opinion?
2. Explain the two negations. Which one do you support?
3. What is the controversy between materialism and spiritualism according to Aurobindo‘s thoughts? What is his solution?
4. Give the main functions of education as perceived by Aurobindo.
5. Explain the concept of integral education and the aims as laid down by Sri Aurobindo.

6. Write short notes on the following:
(i) Curriculum in integral education.
(ii) Methods of teaching according to Aurobindo.
(iii) Principles of teaching and learning.
(iv) Role of teacher in integral education.
(v) Views of Sri Aurobindo on National system of education.


Further readings
 Aggarwal, J.C. and Gupta S. (2006), Great Philosophers and Thinkers on Education, Shilpa Publications, New Delhi. Aggarwal, S., (2007), Philosophical Foundations of Education, Author Press, New Delhi. Chandra, S. S. and Sharma, R. K., (2004), Principles of Education, Atlantic Publishers and Distributors, New Delhi. Chaube S.P., (1988) Indian and Western Educational Philosophers, Vinod Pusthak Mandir, Agra. Joshi, S. (2006), Great Indian Educational Thinkers, Authors‘ Press, New Delhi. Mishra P.K. & Dash P.C. (2010), An introduction to Philosophical and Sociological Foundations of Education, Mangalam Publications Delhi. Pandey R.S.,(1997), East-West Thoughts on Education, Horizon Publications, Allahabad. Shehsad, A., (2006), Educational thinkers of India, Amol Publications Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi. Shukla, C. S., Shaida B. D. and Safaya R. N.(2008), Teacher in Emerging Indian Society, Dhanpatrai Publishing Co. (P) Ltd, New Delhi. 

Emile Durkheim (French socialist)





    Presentation by: Jennifer Summe, Stephanie Scholl, and Jess Webb

PPT on Emile Durkheim

Social Stratification and Education


What is Social Stratification?
In sociologysocial stratification is a concept involving the "classification of people into groups based on shared socio-economic conditions ... a relational set of inequalities with economic, social, political and ideological dimensions." When differences lead to greater status, power or privilege for some groups over the other it is called Social Stratification.

It is a system by which society ranks categories of people in a hierarchy. Social stratification is based on four basic principles: 
(1) Social stratification is a trait of society, not simply a reflection of individual differences; 
(2) Social stratification carries over from generation to generation;
(3) Social stratification is universal but variable; 
(4) Social stratification involves not just inequality but beliefs as well.

In modern Western societies, stratification is broadly organized into three main layers: upper classmiddle class, and lower class. Each of these classes can be further subdivided into smaller classes (e.g. occupational).

EDUCATION,      SOCIAL STRATIFICATION    AND    DEVELOPMENT

Education and Social Stratification


  •              Meaning of Social Stratification
  •              Features
  •              The categories of Social Stratification
  •              The effects of stratification on the lives of individuals and  groups
  •              Causes of Social Stratification
  •              The process of Stratification
  •              Types of Social Stratification



  •  EDUCATION AND SOCIAL STRATIFICATION:

In Sociology and Anthropology, social stratification is the hierarchical arrangement of individuals into social classes, castes and divisions within a society. These hierarchies, which may be overtly or covertly preset, or not present at all in some societies, are quite common in state-level societies. 

In our society we rank people according to the scarce resources they control. Money and property are scarce resources in our society and those who own a great deal of money and property, wealthy people, can use this resource to gain power. It has been said that very respected people also control another scarce resource – public respect and that they can use this resource to gain power. 


Political leaders are likewise powerful because they are in a position to control the members of a political party. This ranking of people according to their wealth, prestige or party position is known as Social Stratification. Stratification separates the rich from the poor, the powerful from the powerless. Those who possess scarce resources have a high rank and those who do not possess them have a low rank. 

Our place in the stratification system influences every part of our lives; where we live, go to school and work; what we eat how we vote and whom we marry. Our sexual behavior, sports, hobbies and health are all affected by the rank society gives us. Therefore social stratification is an area of great interest to sociologists.
  •  MEANING OF SOCIAL STRATIFICATION:
The term stratification is derived from the geological concept of   ‘Strata’ which means rock layers created by natural processes. Stratification is a hierarchy of positions with regard to economic production which influences the social rewards to those in the positions.
  • DEFINITION:-
According Raymond W. Murray; “Social Stratification is horizontal division of society into ‘higher’ and ‘lower’ social units.” Every society is divided into more or less distinct groups. Even the most primitive societies had some form of social stratification.

  • FEATURES :

The main features of social stratification are;

1. It is a social and economic categorization of individuals within a societal framework.

2. It is based on Caste, Class, and Status & Power of a Community or Section of People within the framework of a society.

3. Social Stratification exists because of natural differences in peoples abilities.

4. Due to Social Stratification societies tend to be stable and are held together through consensus.

5. It lessens conflicts & provides structure.

6. Social Stratification is a natural & voluntary separation according to race, social & economic status.

  •    THE CATEGORIES OF SOCIAL STRATIFICATION:

The categories of social stratification are; social class, gender, race and ethnicity and age and disability.
Some indicative features of these categories are as follows:

a) Social Class
• Distinction between wealth and income and their distribution in society.
• Social mobility and the link between class and life chances.
• Changing nature of class and its relationship to the economy and occupational structure.

b) Gender
• Difference between biological notion of sex and the socially constructed notion of gender.
• Nature and consequences of gender-role socialisation.
• Gender inequalities in terms of occupation, family and social roles and expectations.

c) Race and Ethnicity
• Nature, size and distribution of different racial and ethnic groups in modern society.
• Inequality relating to race and ethnicity; in particular, discrimination in education, employment and on life chances.
• Role of the mass media in the formation of stereotypes and the consequences for ethnic groups.

d) Age
• Social construction of the concept of age, including awareness of different notions of childhood, adolescence and old age in different societies.
• Inequalities as a result of age, such as employment, unemployment, low pay, access to benefits and restrictions on social behaviour.
• Implications of changes in the age structure of modern society.

e) Disability
• Social construction of disability.
• Inequality relating to disability; in particular, discrimination in education, employment and on life chances.
• Role of the mass media in the formation of negative stereotypes and the consequences for disabled individuals and groups.


  •  The effects of stratification on the lives of individuals groups :

The above aspects of social stratification should be studies in order to explore the nature of social relationships, processes, structures and issues. Sub-cultural, cross-cultural, historical, contemporary or anthropological examples should be used wherever possible and candidates should be encouraged to apply insights to current social issues or their own life experiences. Cross-cultural and/or anthropological examples may be drawn from the Socialization.


  • Causes of Social Stratification:

There are five basic points which gives clear idea about the causes of social stratification;

Inequality – Inequality exists because of natural differences in people’s abilities.

Conflict – Stratification occurs due to conflict between different classes, with the upper classes using superior power to take a larger share of the social resources.

Power – Power influences one’s definition of self and the importance of ideas in defining social situations.

Wealth – Difference in the wealth is also one of the causes of social stratification.

Instability – Instability in the society being the cause of social stratification enhances stability and induces members of the society to work hard. 


STRATIFICATION AND EQUALITY EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY:

Social stratification refers to differential access to resources, power, autonomy, and status across social groups. Social stratification implies social inequality; if some groups have access to more resources than others, the distribution of those resources is inherently unequal.

Societies can be stratified on any number of dimensions. In the United States, the most widely recognized stratification systems are based on race, social class, and gender. The challenge for those of us interested in understanding the implications of social stratification and social inequality for mental health is to trace the processes through which macrostructures of social stratification become manifest in the micro conditions of individual lives.
Those micro conditions can be objective or subjective, and the effects of objective conditions often depend on how those conditions are subjectively perceived. Thus, the study of social stratification and mental health requires that we think at multiple levels of analysis and about the connections between objective and subjective experiences.

Given renewed interest in macro-micro links among sociologists (e.g., Huber, 1990) and the centrality of subjective perceptions in social-psychological theory, the study of social stratification and mental health is a quintessentially sociological project.

"Even though social stratification is a multi-disciplinary and multi-dimensional field of study, there is a tendency to understand it mainly from the perspective of sociology. Further, most analysts perceive Indian society as a series of antinomies such as caste/class, caste/power, structure/culture and structure/process. Departing significantly from both these viewpoints, this book provides a comprehensive understanding of social stratification and mobility in
India drawing essential inputs from major debates and dialogues in various branches of the social sciences.

"Focusing on different segments of society--such as rural- agrarian and urban-industrial--K.L. Sharma covers a wide gamut of theoretical and methodological issues. He emphasizes the need to study the ideology, structure and process of social inequality both temporally
and contextually. The inclusion of discussions on social stratification particularly enriches the comparative perspective of the study. The role of the state and its policies in the structuring of social stratification is also explored.

"The author maintains that while the cult urological explanation of social mobility suffers from serious inadequacies, the structural perspective alone is unable to explain the entire range of structure and change in the context of social inequality. He suggests that the caste-
class-power nexus approach is not only more relevant for analyzing social stratification and mobility, but does away with antinomies as well.

"On the whole, this chapter provides a holistic understanding of the complexities of Indian society by analyzing the historical, cultural and political bases of social stratification. It will be of particular interest to students and scholars of sociology, social anthropology, and political
sociology, as also to concerned intellectuals and planners."

  •  Equality of Educational Opportunity
Equality is said to exist only when inequality has been removed. But in reality inequality is not totally eliminated. Whatever measures may be taken to ensure equality, inequality will exist to some degree. Thus what the programmes of equality do or can do is to narrow down the inequalities. It means “elimination of that level or type of Inequality which is considered undesirable or unacceptable within the society.” So the purist of equality aims not at total equality in the philosophical sense, but at an equitable distribution of societal resources.

Modern society views education as an important societal resource and a means of achieving the goal of egalitarianism. Education is looked upon as a means of raising the social status of an individual in various ways. It is accepted as a basic human need to have a desirable quality of life. Given equal opportunity for general, vocational, technical and professional education most citizens have equal status in the society.
Education is often considered as an equalizer.

Equality of educational opportunities means that an individual has equal access to education. Equality of educational opportunities is one of the goals of the ideology of Egalitarianism. However, inequality of educational opportunities exists throughout the world and more so in
India.

The Education Commission (1964-1966) has observed: “The main social objectives of education is to equalize opportunity, enabling the backward or underprivileged classes and individuals to use education as a lever for the improvement of their condition. Every society that values social justice and is anxious to improve a lot of the common man and cultivate all available talent must ensure progressive equality of opportunity to all sections of the population.


  • Differential standard of Educational Institutions:

Children from poor families receive education in substandard institutions which are not properly equipped with teachers, teaching aids and apparatus. Usually urban schools and colleges are of better standard than rural schools and colleges. Differences in the standard of educational institutions ultimately cause inequality in the standard of students.

  •  Positive Discrimination in the Indian context:

In order to ensure equalization of educational opportunities certain measures to be taken with immediate effect. These measures may be based on the needs and status of disadvantaged groups, disabled children, and girls.

1. Primary Education: Primary education should seek to satisfy the basic needs of all
people. There should not be any differentiation of curricula at this stage.
Equality of educational opportunities at the primary stage requires
provision of free and compulsory education for all children without any
discrimination.

2. Secondary Education: Individual differences among boys and girls are more prominent at
the secondary stage diversified curricula should be introduced to cater to
the needs, interests and capabilities of students.

3. Higher Professional Education: At the stage of higher education and professional education
emphasis should be placed on individual capacity or merit and
maintenance of quality and standard.

4. Compensatory Education: Disadvantaged children have an unstimulating environment. They
attend primary schools without prerequisite learning which are necessary
for successful completion of primary education.

Common School System:
Equalization of educational opportunity necessitates adoption of a
common school system-both at the primary and secondary stages. It will
be a system-

1. Which will be open to all children without any discrimination?

2. Where admission will be based on talent.

3. Which will maintain adequate facilities and reasonably good
standards?

4. Where no tuition fee will be charged.

5. Which will meet the needs and aspirations of the middle and lower
classes.

Nationalization of education system is an important step to
equalize educational opportunities. There should be only one agency in the
country to spread and control education. No private agency should be
allowed to function in the field of education. Uniform educational
facilities can only be provided in a national system of education.

  •  Free Education and Scholarships
To provide free and universal primary education for the age group 6-14 is a constitutional obligation. All Education should be tuition free. Free textbooks and writing materials should be made available to poor and meritorious students to ensure equality no limited for introducing large number of loan-scholarships, improving the method of selection.

  • Equalization of Educational opportunity

The equalization of educational opportunities is essentially linked with the equality notions in the social system. The social system which intends to provide equal opportunities for the advancement of all has to make provisions for equal educational opportunities also. In modern industrial society education has become the main agency for socializing new born into law abiding citizens and productive members of the society.
Formal education has become almost indispensable because to participate in economic production one needs to learn specialized skills which cannot be acquired through family or any other agency. Due to the indispensability of formal education in advanced industrial societies education is provided by the state as a matter of right for all its citizens.

Formal institutions – schools, colleges and universities are organized for this purpose.

In most societies today legislations exist guaranteeing equality of  the right of education. In fact to realize this ideal of equality of educational opportunities special efforts are made by the welfare states in industrial societies to provide compulsory education to the socially deprived. In developing countries like India state has assumed the responsibility to
provide universal free education at the school level. Special policy measures have been developed to spread modern scientific secular education to rural areas and policy of protective discriminating has been adopted to encourage the traditionally deprived section like SC and ST to take to modern education. However in spite of the creation of a legal
framework in most societies to ensure quality of educational opportunity such an ideal continues to be elusive in reality even in the industrially advanced societies.

Bourdon relates the costs and benefits of course selection to family and peer group solidarity. His work has important implications for practical solutions to the problem of inequality of education opportunity.  Even if positive discrimination worked and schools were able to
compensate for the primary effects of stratification considerable inequality of educational opportunity would remain.

Bourdon argues that there are two ways of removing the secondary effects of stratification. The first involves the educational system. If it provides a single compulsory curriculum for all students the element of choice in the selection of course and duration of stay in the system would be removed. The individual would no longer be influenced by his courses and remain in full time education for the same period of time. He said that more the branching points there are in the educational system point at which the student can leave or choose between alternative courses the more likely working class students are to leave or choose lower level
courses. 

The gradual raising of the school leaving age in all advanced industrial societies has reduced inequality of educational opportunity but the present trend indicates that this reduction will at best proceed at a  much slower rate. Bourdon’s second solution to the problem of inequality of educational opportunity is the abolition of social stratification. He feels that this is the direction of economic equality as the most effective way of reducing inequality or educational opportunity. 

As a result he argues that the key to equality of opportunity lies outside rather than inside the schools. Bourdon concludes: for inequality or educational opportunity to be eliminated, either a society must be unstratified or its school system must be completely undifferentiated.

  •  Problems concerning equality of opportunities in education

Education helps in establishing equality and ensuring social justice
but the system of education itself can add to the existing inequalities or at
least perpetuate the same. Inequalities of educational opportunities arise
due to Poverty as the poor cannot afford to meet the expenses of education.

Children studying in the rural schools have to compete with the
children in urban areas where there are well-equipped schools.

In the places where no primary, secondary or collegiate educational
institutions exist children do not get the same opportunity as those who
have all these in their neighborhood.

Wide inequalities also arise from differences in home environments. A
child from a rural household or slum does not have the same
opportunity as a child from an upper class home with educated parents.

There is wide sex disparity in India. Here girl’s education is not given
the same encouragement as boys.

Education of backward classes including SC and ST and economically
backward sections is not at par with that of other communities or
classes.

  •  Compensatory Education Programmes

DEFINITION:

COMPENSATORY EDUCATION is a program of supplementary
instruction designed to meet the individual needs of students performing
significantly below expected achievement levels in language arts, maths,
and/or reading.

POLICY:

Compensatory education, in the form of supplementary instruction,
will be provided to selected students who are performing
significantly below expected achievement levels in language arts,
mathematics, and/or reading. The CEP is intended to be primarily for
students who do not require special education services. However,
special education students who meet the CEP entrance requirements
would be eligible to be considered for the CEP.

The CEP is designed to be a program of Supplementary instruction
and as such will not be used to provide the primary instruction for
regular or special Education students.

An ongoing assessment program, which may include criterion
referenced tests, will be conducted to identify students eligible for
compensatory education supplementary instruction and to determine
student progress and program effectiveness.

Testing procedures used for placements and progress evaluation of
students will be valid and fair.

For staffing, budget, and overall program planning, the number of
students performing at or below the 40th percentile on norm-
referenced standardized tests in language arts, maths, and reading
will be used.

Compensatory education programs will include a parent involvement
component.

Instructional priority will be given to students in grades one through
four. Preventative measures at these grade levels are proven to be the
most reliable.

Systematic procedures for annual program evaluation, to include
recordkeeping, will be used to ensure maintenance and improvement
of compensatory education services.

  •  Responsibilities
The Director is responsible for: a. Ensuring the development, implementation, program –evaluation.
b. Coordinating with the chiefs of the Education, Fiscal, Logistics,

The regional director is responsible for:
a. Ensuring the development, implementation, program evaluation,
and improvement of a regional CEP consistent-with concepts
identified.
b. Providing enrollment figures, test data, and other pertinent
information, as required, to support staffing and resource
allocations.

The district superintendent is responsible for:
a.Coordinating with regional office staff regarding the CEP’s.
b. Ensuring implementation and evaluation of school level CEP's

The school principal, where staff is assigned, is responsible for:
a. Ensuring the development, implementation, an annual
evaluation, and improvement of a school CEP consistent with the
concepts and processes identified.
b. Making recommendations to the district superintendent and/or
regional director identifying the school’s specific needs in
compensatory education.
c. Utilizing a committee to develop a plan for a school CEP.
d. Implementing the plan for compensatory education services.
e. Providing the regional director and/or district superintendent
with enrollment figures, test data, annual evaluation report, and
other pertinent information, as required, to support staffing and
resource allocations.

  •  Enriching the Compensatory Education Programme

The development of compensatory education programs has
traditionally been informed by the belief that disadvantaged students can
benefit most from a less challenging curriculum and limited achievement
goals. Evaluations “effectiveness" reinforce the curriculum deficiency by
measuring only the improvement in scores on reading and arithmetic tests,
and by failing to deal with the overall achievement of students.

  • Coordination of Regular and Compensatory Education Classes

Often there is a lack of clarity about the purpose of compensatory
education services, with divergent perceptions found among the support
staff, the core classroom teachers, and administrators. Most studies
indicate that there are few efforts to coordinate various special or
supplementary programs with core or regular programs, few procedures
for cooperative/joint planning among the various program teachers at the
school, and even fewer district- or building-level policies to foster
cooperative planning among the various suppliers of programs or services.
Thus, students often end up with less instructional time than other
students.

For instance, regular classroom teachers often report that the
reading resource teachers rarely offer instructional information,
suggestions, or materials. Support program teachers are often unable to
identify the reading instruction material their remedial students use in the
regular classroom. Regular classroom and reading resource teachers are
often confused about who is responsible for which aspects of instructional
planning and delivery. Reading is often taught as an "unrelated skill"--i.e.,
reading of reading texts--not as a skill needed for other learning and study
areas. What is needed is congruence between curricula what is to be
taught, in what order, and using which materials, and between the methods
of instruction (Ellington & Johnson, 1986). Conflicts arise when the

reading strategies taught and learned in one setting are radically different
from those in the second setting, such as emphasis on decoding versus a
focus on comprehension.

Thursday, 27 December 2012

Paulo Friere


                      INTRODUCTION of Paulo Friere


The Brazilian educator Paulo Freire‘s is one among the most of the influential educational thinkers of the late 20th century. Born in Recife, Brazil, on September 19, 1921, Freire‘s died of heart failure in Sao Paulo, Brazil on May 2, 1997. After a brief career as a lawyer, he taught Portuguese in secondary schools from 1941-1947. He subsequently became active in adult education and workers' training, and became the first Director of the Department of Cultural Extension of the University of Recife (1961-1964). Freire quickly gained international recognition for his experiences in literacy training in Northeastern Brazil. Following the military coup d'etat of 1964, he was jailed by the new government and eventually forced into a political exile that lasted fifteen-years. In 1969 he was a visiting scholar at Harvard University and then moved to Geneva, Switzerland where he assumed the role of special educational adviser to the World Congress of Churches. Hereturned to Brazil in 1979. Finally, in 1988 he became the Minister of Education for Sao Paulo (Rage and Hope: Paulo Freire‘s, n.d.). This position enabled him to institute educational reform throughout most of Brazil. 

PAULO FREIRE‘S CONCEPT OF EDUCATION

 Freire's most well known work is Pedagogy of the Oppressed (1970). Throughout this and subsequent books, he argues for system of education that emphasizes learning as an act of culture and freedom. Paulo Freire is neither an idealist, nor a realist or a mechanist. Freire denies the view that man is abstract, isolated, independent and unattached to the world. He also denies that the world exists as a reality apart from men. In his view consciousness and world are simultaneous. Consciousness neither precedes the world as the idealist hold nor it follows the world as the materialist believe, Paulo‘s position is near to the existentialists who give much emphasis on existential man equipped with strong will power who can transform the world with his own efforts . In short, the role of man as a Subject in the world and with the world." Freire‘s work mainly concerned literacy and the desire to help men and women overcome their sense of powerlessness by acting in their own behalf. The oppressed, as he called them, could transform their situation in life by thinking critically about reality and then taking action. Freire believed that the educational system played a central role in maintaining oppression and thus it had to be reformed in order for things to change for the oppressed.
Knowledge is not an isolated phenomenen. It comprehends both action and reflection. In his words the act of knowing involves the dialectical movement which goes from action to reflection and from reflection upon action to a new action.

A SET OF POLITICAL AND PEDAGOGIC PRINCIPLES


A SET OF POLITICAL PRINCIPLES : the principal goal of popular education is to change the power relationships in our society the objective is to create mechanisms of collective power over all the structures of society the means of attaining this goal cannot be in contradiction with the final objective—to construct a really democratic society you cannot use authoritarian methods the projects, strategies and tactics used in the political process have to be produced collectively by the participants themselves

A SET OF PEDAGOGIC PRINCIPLES : the learners are the SUBJECTS, not the objects of the learning process; through this approach they can become the SUBJECTS of society the educator and the learners are equal participants in the learning process; all are the producers of knowledge the learning process is developed by a continuous dialogue between the educator and the learners the objective of the learning process is to liberate the participants from their external and internal oppression; to make them capable of changing their reality, their lives and the society they live in.

Check your Progress: Answer the following questions: 
1. Describe the historical context of Pedagogy of the oppressed.
2. Why is Freire considered an existentialist?
3. Discuss the political and pedagogical principles.


 BANKING EDUCATION

In this form of education, it is the job of the teacher to deposit in the minds of the learners, considered to be empty or ignorant, bits of information or knowledge, much like we deposit money in a [empty] bank account. This is why Freire called this model of education 'banking education'. Freire criticized this model of education because he believed that it makes the students into passive objects to be acted upon by the teacher. He argued that the goal of 'banking education' is to demobilize the people within the existing establishment of power by conditioning them to accept the cultural, social, political status quo of the dominant culture.

In the banking education model knowledge/education is seen as a gift given to the student by the teacher who considers the learner as marginal, ignorant and resource-less. Freire saw this as false generosity from the dominant group (oppressors) and a way of dominating and controlling the people (the oppressed) to improve or maintain their own interests. Freire put forward the notion that authoritarian forms of education such as banking education prevented learners from 'knowing' the world and from seeing it as something which can be changed.
He believed that authoritarian forms of education inhibited the liberation and freedom of the oppressed.
The banking education maintains and even stimulates the contradiction through the following attitudes and practices, which mirror oppressive society as a whole:

(a) the teacher teaches and the students are taught;
(b) the teacher knows everything and the students know nothing;
(c) the teacher thinks and the students are thought about;
(d) the teacher talks and the students listen-meekly;
(e) the teacher disciplines and the students are disciplined;
(f) the teacher chooses and enforces his choice, and the students comply;
(g) the teacher acts and the students have the illusion of acting through the action of the teacher;
(h) the teacher chooses the program content, and the students (who were not consulted) adapt to it;
(i) the teacher confuses the authority of knowledge with his own professional authority, which he sets in opposition to the freedom of the students;
(j) the teacher is the Subject of the learning process, while the pupils are mere objects.

 It is not surprising that the banking concept of education regards men as adaptable, manageable beings, The more the students work at storing the deposits entrusted to them, the less they develop the critical consciousness which would result from their intervention in the world. The more completely they accept the passive role imposed on them, the more they tend simply to adapt to the world as it is and to the fragmented view of reality deposited in them.

Freire argued that change could come through a process of dialogue and reflection leading on to change through action or intervention and or political change. Freire called this process Praxis.


A PROBLEM-POSING MODEL

To challenge the banking education model, Freire proposed a problem-posing model of education. In this model, the teacher and the learner discuss and analyse their experiences, feelings and knowledge of the world together. Instead of the belief that learners' and teacher's situation in the world is fixed, as the banking model suggests, the problem-posing model explores problems or realities people find themselves in as something which can be transformed.

Paulo Freire's "problem posing concept of education" is based on his "anthropological concept of culture" which is based on Freire's distinction between animals and humans. For Paulo Freire, "man is the only one to treat not only his actions but his very self as the object of his reflection; the capacity distinguished him from the animals, which are unable to reflect upon it."
Animals are "beings in themselves", are "ahistorical", are "merely stimulated", "animals cannot commit themselves". Paulo Freire's "anthropological concept of culture" is It is not the job of the teacher to provide answers to the problems, but to help the learners achieve a form of critical thinking about the situation (Freire called this conscientization).
This makes it possible to understand that the world or society is not fixed and is potentially open to transformation. It becomes possible to imagine a new and different reality. In order for students to be able to confront oppression, they must first become critical thinkers.

 Freire believes that critical thinking is not possible in a banking education framework, but only in a problem-posing educational framework. In the banking system of education, students are primarily asked to memorize and regurgitate often meaningless and disjointed facts; whereas in a problem-posing framework, students are asked to use critical thinking skills to investigate various problems that exist in the world.
Freire made the distinction between these two types of educational frameworks in POTO (Pedagogy of the Oppressed)

 Whereas banking education anesthetizes and inhibits creative power, Problem-posing education involves a constant unveiling of reality.

 The former attempts to maintain the submersion of consciousness; The latter strives for the emergence of consciousness and critical intervention in reality.

Students under this framework would pose problems and then critically investigate why those problems exist. (For example, students may ask: Why does poverty exist in the United States? Freire believes that a problem-posing education will not only allow students to become critical thinkers, but reveal that the world is constantly undergoing change.

In problem-posing education, people develop their power to perceive critically the problem. In order to undertake this process successfully, the people (oppressed) must challenge their own perception of the dominant group (oppressor) Freire argued that the oppressed think of themselves as 'less than' or something lacking. He suggested that they have been conditioned to view the practices and behaviours of the dominant groups as complete, whole and correct. To become whole complete and correct means to simulate the practices of the dominant culture. To counter this perception means engaging the learner in a process of
dis-identification with dominant culture/oppressor and to help the learner to imagine a new being and a new life according to their own rationality.



TEACHING AIDS 

Some of the tools a banking education model might use include a pre-prescribed curriculum, syllabus or course book, which either takes no account or makes assumptions of learners' views or knowledge of the world. Freire called these pre-prescribed plans and course books as primers.

Paulo Freire saw no use for traditional primers. How does a person benefit from repeation ―Eve saw the grape‖, this statement has nothing to do with reality. Freire stated that ―There will be no significant learning if the pupil fails to establish a relationship with the object, if he doesn‘t act towards it.‖

 As a result of this belief, Freire wrote cultural primers in the late 1950‘s with the object of building a revolutionary society. His basic objective with the primers was to present concrete reality to be transformed. Program content should be presented to allow the pupils to take control of it little by little rather than just receiving the content. Teaching materials should be written regionally or even locally. He believed that the universalization of teaching material to reading is an absurdity scientifically and an act of authority politically (Gadotti, 1994).

The Freirean cultural circle made use of slide projectors – imported from Poland at – which were used to display film slides that were the centerpiece of Freire‘s literacy training because of their ability to foster a collective learning environment and amplify reflective distancing (Sayers & Brown, 1993, pp. 32-33). For the slides, Freire enlisted the well-known artist Francisco Brenand to create ‗codified pictures‘ that were designed to help peasants semantically visualize the ‗culture making capacities composed of 10 situations that intended to reveal how peasant life is cultural (and not natural) and thus human (and not animal).

Freire‘s film slides were displayed on the walls of peasants‘ homes, whereupon dialogues were conducted that analyzed the slides‘ various pictorial elements. The pictures themselves depicted a range of premodern and modern technologies, as well as other cultural artifacts. Freire‘s film slides were displayed on the walls of peasants‘ homes, whereupon dialogues adopt technology pedagogically to demonstrate people‘s inherent productive and communicative abilities, as well as the possibility of their utilizing modern technologies critically and as part of a means to rehumanized ends.


 DIALOGUE

A central theme of Paulo Freire is that of dialogue. Dialogue is a part of human nature, we need each other to discover and discovery is a social process and discussion is the cement. He thought that the moment of dialogue was the moment of transformation. Freire saw the dialogue of the elite as vertical. He called it banking pedagogy.

The person who is learning only needs to listen while the educator deposits knowledge. This narrative form of education maintains the division between those who know and those who don‘t. Freire viewed dialogue as a horizontal relationship based on love respect and tolerance. It follows then that Banking education and problemitazation are opposite methods "Finally," comments Freire, "true dialogue cannot exist unless the dialoguers engage in critical thinking…thinking which perceives reality as process, as transformation, rather than as a static activity‖ (Ibid, 92).

 True dialogue is for Freire what civic education must be about. If civic education does not include it, then there is little hope that the future will be anything for the oppressed but a continuation of the present. ―Authentic education is not carried on by ‗A‘ for ‗B‘ or by ‗A‘ about ‗B,‘ but by ‗A‘ with ‗B‘…‖ Essential to such education are the experiences of the students, whatever their ages or situations. "The act of knowing involves a dialectical movement that goes from action to reflection and from reflection upon action to a new action." (Freire 1972).
"If learning to read and write is to constitute an act of knowing, the learners must assume from the beginning the role of creative subjects. It is not a matter of memorising and repeating given syllables, words and
phrases but rather, reflecting critically on the process of reading and writing itself and on the profound significance of language" (Freire 1985) That power is to be used to liberate themselves from oppression. This pedagogy to end oppression, as Freire writes, ―must be forged with, not for, the oppressed‖ (1970, 48; emphases in original), irrespective of whether they are children or adults.

Freire worked primarily with illiterate adult peasants in South America, but his work has applications as well to schools and school-aged children. It is to be a pedagogy for all, and Freire includes oppressors and the oppressed. Freire wanted his students, whether adult peasants or a country's youth, to value their cultures as they simultaneously questioned some of those cultures' practices and ethos.

This Freire referred to as ―reading the word‖—as in ending illiteracy—and ―reading the world‖—the ability to analyze social and political situations that influenced and especially limited people's life chances. For Freire, to question was not enough; people must act as well. Liberation, therefore, is a ―praxis,‖ but it cannot consist of action alone, which Freire calls ―activism.‖ It must be, instead, action combined with ―serious reflection‖ (Ibid, 79, 65). This reflection or ―reflective participation‖ takes place in dialogue with others who are in the same position of realization and action. The oppressed thereby use their own experiences and language to explain and surmount their oppression. They do not rely upon others, even teachers, to explain their oppressed circumstances. ―Through dialogue, the teacher-of-the-students and the students-of the-teacher cease to exist and a new term emerges: teacher-student with students-teachers‖ (Ibid, 80). The reciprocity of roles means that students teach teachers as teachers teach students. Dialogue encourages everyone to teach and everyone to create together.


PAULO FREIRE METHODOLOGY

 ・ TO SEE the situation lived by the participants
 ・ TO ANALYZE this situation, analyzing the root causes (socio-economic, political, cultural, etc.)
 ・ TO ACT to change this situation, following the precepts of Social Justice.

PAULO FREIRE METHODOLOGY INDEPTH ―PROBLEMATIZATION‖

I. FIND THE PROBLEMS (GENERATIVE THEMES)
participants research – get to know participants and their life and work settings
get the background and facts about the issues that affected them
understanding / READING the World in which we live together

II. PRODUCE THE CODES (CODIFICATION)
create a material representation ( a drawing, a video, a photo, a puppet show, an audiotape, etc. ) to capture the GENERATIVE THEMES.
create a play or skit including many or all of the GENERATIVE THEMES
what are your ideas?

III. THREE STEPS INDUCTIVE QUESTIONING PROCESS

A. TO SEE THE SITUATION AS PARTICIPANTS EXPERIENCE IT
 describe the situation shown in the CODE define the problems in the situation make the link between the participants and the problems

B. TO ANALYZE THE SITUATION (The Problem Tree) Why did this happen? How is this perpetuated and/or sustained? What are the immediate effects and the root causes of these problems? (socioeconomic, political, cultural)

C. TO ACT TO CHANGE THE SITUATION short term ACTion (next 3 days, 3 weeks, 3 months: affecting one of the Problem Tree‘s leaves) long term ACTion (next 3 months, 3 years: affecting one of the Problem Trees‘ source roots)
The 3 Basic Steps of this Methodology are: to SEE, to ANALYZE, to ACT. These steps are repeated over and over again, following the changes in the situation as experienced by the participants.

CONCLUSION :
Paulo Freire is often described as a humanistic, militant educator who believed that solutions in education are always found in concrete context. Students should be asked what they want to learn. There must be a collaboration, union and cultural synthesis. The educator should not manipulate students but should also not leave them to their own fate. He should direct tasks and study not order students. He believed that the liberating educator invites students to think. This allows the student to make and remake their worlds and become more human. Freire believed that communication should be simple even if the information is complex. Simplifying, allows for deeper accessibility by the students.

Bibliography : Sinha K., 1995, Education Comparitive Study of Gandhi and Freire, Commonwealth Publishers, New Delhi.